The Stance Of Law Upon Polygamy And Bigamy In India

The Stance Of Law Upon Polygamy And Bigamy In India

Table of Contents

Concept 

Polygamy is a state of marrying more than two partners or having more than two wives. Polygamy is not a new concept. It I prevalent in the system throughout history. The Indian rulers had multiple wives and the case was similar in the context of the world. The Indian law system later started the crusade toward the right to establish equality which resulted in penalizing the practice of polygamy by people belonging to the Hindus and other religions. Although, the practice is prevalent in the Muslim law having multiple aspects.

The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Section 11 – The subsequent marriage during the existence of a prior marriage or the polygamous marriage will stand null and void under Hindu Law. It will be declared null and void by a decree of nullity.  

Section 17 – Any marriage between two Hindus solemnized after the commencement of this Act is void if at the date of such marriage either party had a husband or wife living; and the provisions of sections 494 and 495 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), shall apply accordingly. 

Section 494 Of The Indian Penal Code

“Marrying again during lifetime of husband or wife.—Whoever, having a husband or wife living, marries in any case in which such marriage is void by reason of its taking place during the life of such husband or wife, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.” 

Section 2 Of The Shariat Act

It provides the entire authority of dealing with questions related to Muslim Marriages to the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.

Views Of The Supreme Court

  1. The apex court in the case of Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India ((Sarla Mudgal v Union of India, (1995), SC 1531)) strictly prohibited the practice of polygamy by converting to Islam. The court held that without any legal dissolution of subsisting marriage prior to the conversion to Islam will have same footing as it would have if the person did not convert to Islam. Such practices were outlawed by the court. 
  2. In the case of Lily Thomas v. Union of India ((Lily Thomas v Union of India (2000) 6 SCC 224)), the court reiterated its ratio held in the Sarla Mudgal case and prohibited the practice of bigamy or polygamy by converting to Islam. 

18th Law Commission (227th Report) Recommendations

The 18th Law Commission constituted in the year 2006 for years gave recommendations to prevent bigamy via conversion to Islam and bring evolution in the stringency of laws against such practice. The recommendations were as follows: 

  1. Section 17A must be inserted after section 17 in the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, prohibiting the practice of marrying again after converting to Islam and without dissolving the prior subsisting marriages. It would be punishable under section 494 and 495 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.
  2. The same provision must be incorporated in the acts of different religions the Christian Marriage Act 1872, the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 and the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939.
  3. Proviso of Section 4 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 must be deleted providing immunity to the non-Muslim woman.
  4. The anti-bigamy provision must be included in the Special Marriage Act, of 1954 to govern inter-religion marriages.
  5. Bigamy under section 494-495 must be turned as a cognizable offence by bringing an amendment in the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Current Scenario

There is a plea made before the court in the year 2022 in the case of Reshama v. Union of India ((Akshita Saxena, Plea in Delhi High Court Seeks Muslim Men To Obtain Prior Consent From Existing Wife Before Subsequent Marriage, Notice Issued, Live Law (2 May 2022 3:13 PM), https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/delhi-high-court-polygamy-muslim-men-second-marriage-wife-consent-198070?infinitescroll=1)) contending that any Muslim marriage again without taking permission from the wife must be declared an unconstitutional practice. Additionally, marrying again without making proper arrangements for accommodation for prior wives and children and without any arrangement for their maintenance must be declared unconstitutional. The petitioner cited the stance of Pakistan and Bangladesh upon regulating the practice of polygamy and bigamy.  

Conclusion

Polygamy is an uncelebrated practice that is considered immoral in the eyes of the law. The tradition of converting to Islam for marrying again was condemned and outlawed by the apex court. Furthermore, the recommendations in the 227th Law Report also enlightened the path of prohibiting the application of marrying several times during the subsistence of prior marriage. The crusade has resulted in a plea before the court stating that polygamy in Muslim law for the attainment of sexual desires of men or self-interest must be regulated.

Author – Khushi Shukla, a student of Indore Institute of Law.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. The facts and opinions appearing in the article do not reflect the views of Adjuva Legal and Adjuva Legal does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.

Share This Post

Top Rated Service 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 54.9
4.9Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
verified by Trustindex
Trustindex verifies that the company has a review score above 4.5, based on reviews collected on Google over the past 12 months, qualifying it to receive the Top Rated Certificate.
Posted on Google Google
Ashish Ambashtha
8 June 2021
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
- They provided a quick fix and a satisfying solution to my issue that was pending for long. - I made the best decision when I approached them and they understood the situation and dealt with it in the most professional manner. - Easy quick and the best online platform for legal services. - Definitely recommended. - I wish them all the best for all the future endeavours!
Posted on Google Google
Umang Agarwal
29 May 2021
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Quick response, specific documentation and good advice
Posted on Google Google
Shashank Shekhar
4 November 2025
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Ur very good person and I wish u achieved everything.in ur life
Posted on Google Google
Sana Singh
10 September 2024
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Very ethical platform to take legal services.
Posted on Google Google
Arti
10 July 2022
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Hey, this good experience adjuva !! The team is very humble & responsive.
Posted on Google Google
L Chatterjee
19 February 2021
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
When it's mandatory for any organisation to be highly professional sometimes we get to see higher quality management too but my experience with this organisation is unique. They offer professionalism, they offer payment clarity, they look into client satisfaction above all what you experience is humanity which is rarest at of the rare now a days. I not only appreciate their services but I am so very much thankful to them and shall always remember that... All my best wishes to the prosperity of the organisation. Special thanks to Updesh
Posted on Google Google
ayushi gupta
6 October 2023
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Thankyou so much... Aaj kl k time koi refund ni krta... i really appreciate it
Posted on Google Google
Kanika Jayant
19 March 2022
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Thank you for guiding clearly on the process.
Posted on Google Google
Modest_Nuts
16 August 2022
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
@Utkarsh Srivastav thankyou for giving such a great solution it's really helpful...!!!
Posted on Google Google
kundan kaushal
13 June 2021
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have tried and wasted money here n there but finally i met with Adjuiva Legal Team. It is the best solution provider i wll say... Fast process, Confidential and Reasonable.

Recent Articles👇🏻

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Email(Required)

Book a Time to talk 😍

To get Instant support - call us or send a message

Get Your First Consultation FREE via whatsApp!